The nature of “simple materials” is also called “evil nature”? ——A debater who refuted the “evil nature” of “Xunzi”
Author: Lin Guizhen
Source: Author’s authorization Confucianism Published online, originally published in “Journal of Linyi University” 2015 Issue 5.
Time: Confucius was born in the year 2566, on the 14th day of the ninth month of Yiwei, Yihai
Jesus October 26, 2015
[Abstract] Wang Guowei, Chen Dengyuan, Mou Zongsan, Ludbin and others have used “Emotions are evil” (emotions are inherently evil, or the results can be evil, or the results are often evil, etc.) to prove Xunzi’s theory of “evil nature”, and such innovative explanations have emerged in endlessly to this day. Dr. Chen Lin ingeniously removed Xunzi’s concept of “xing” from the meaning of “emotion-desire” and limited it to only the meaning of “knowledge-energy” and said that the “heart” that governs knowledge and energy has no polite meaning. This is how to construct a “Heart without propriety and righteousness = evil heart = evil nature”. “Born without etiquette and righteousness” is just a simple heartMW Escorts A simple nature does not mean that the heart is evil and evil, and Xunzi’s “nature” It includes sexual desire and refers to many sexual desires. Xunzi’s “neng” does not eliminate psychological functions and sexual desires. According to the clear definitions of “nature-false” and “good-evil” in Xun’s book and the clear proposition that “nature is originally simple – it is clear that human nature is evil”, “nature is simple” and “nature is evil” in this book The entire book “Xunzi” cannot be unified at the most basic level. Any well-intentioned explanation or reconciliation will actually conflict with the definition and strict propositions of Xunzi itself and will be invalid and redundant. Xunzi did not hold the theory of “evil nature”. It should be impossible for Xunzi and Flounder to fall in love, right? The chapter “Evil Nature” is not to argue that human nature is evil and to refute good nature and to establish the theory of evil nature, but to argue that human nature is not good to refute good nature and to establish the theory of simple nature and false habits.
[KeyMalawians SugardaddyWords] Xunzi; simple material; evil nature; evil feelings; evil heart; lust; knowledge and ability
一
March 4, 2013 “China The “Philosophy” page of the 422nd issue of the Chinese Journal of Social Sciences published an article by Chen Lin, a doctoral student in Chinese philosophy at Xiamen University at that time, “Xunzi spoke of “evil nature” with “evil heart” (hereinafter referred to as Dr. Chen Lin and Chen Wen). This was the latest article I had read at the time that argued for Xunzi’s theory of “evil nature”, and the article was from Guangming.com’s theory channelThe article “”The human heart is dangerous, but the heart of the Tao is weak”” – Analysis of Xunzi’s Thoughts on “Evil Nature” published by Dao in 2012 is actually abbreviated from his article “Discrimination and Correction of Xunzi’s Theory of “Evil Nature”” published in 2010 [1 ], and the following article mainly comes from his master’s degree thesis “On the Dual Meanings of Xunzi’s “Heart”” [2][①].
Dr. Chen Lin’s article “Xunzi talks about “evil nature” with “evil heart”” starts from Xunshu’s definition of “nature” and “good-evil”. ：
In the chapter “Evil Nature”, Xunzi said “pottery clay” Turning into pottery, wood into furniture, and medlar wood into straight wood.” These examples to demonstrate “evil nature” are to express that there is no etiquette in human nature, and etiquette must be acquired after learning and thinking. As for the lack of etiquette, The evil that will lead to “disobedience” is to regard human nature as evil. Xunzi first identified the value of propriety and justice, but his so-called “evil” is only a negative concept. It does not mean that “nature” itself is evil, but only that in terms of the state of creation, humanity does not possess propriety and justice. It can be seen that the “good nature” or “evil nature” in Xunzi’s mind is not directed at the desires and emotions in sex. The focus of the issue is whether “xing” has etiquette and meaning.
The so-called “lack of etiquette in sex” should refer to a state of “knowledge” and “ability” and does not touch “emotion” and “desire”. “Knowledge” and “ability” refer to the ability of the heart, so “the nature of nature does not have ritual and righteousness”, which means “the mind of the mind does not possess ritual and righteousness”. Therefore, it can be said that the “evil” of “evil nature” refers to the evil that will eventually lead to “danger and chaos” because the “heart” does not have etiquette and justice. If we do not control our natural desires and allow them to expand infinitely, Behavior and results. Therefore, the “heart” without etiquette becomes the source of evil… Xunzi’s “evil nature” does not mean that nature itself is evil, but is related to real experience, the “knowledge” and “ability” of the heart, and the “concealment” of things. “Related. Therefore, instead of saying that Xunzi said “evil nature”, it is better to say that he said “evil heart”.
Ordinary people understand or interpret Xunzi’s theory of “evil nature” in that Xunzi discusses “evil nature” in terms of “passion” and that the desire in human nature is inherently evil or its consequences can be harmful. Evil, the consequences are often evil to prove that human nature is inherently evil. However, Chen Wen had a different idea: There is no propriety and righteousness in humanity, but the lack of propriety and righteousness in humanity is not enough to prove that one’s nature is evil but only that one’s nature is not good), Malawians EscortAnd this “nature” is the nature of “knowledge” and “ability” rather than the nature of “emotion” and “desire”, so the nature of “evil nature” is the nature of knowing and being able in the mind. , “evil nature” means “evil heart”, that is, the heart is inherently devoid of etiquette and righteousness, and the heart is inherently ignorant of etiquette and righteousness.
Chen Wen’s argument logic is to extrapolate Xunzi’s “xing” to differentIt delimits the concept of “knowledge-ability” of “emotion-desire”, then extrapolates the concept of “knowledge-ability” to the concept of “heart”, and then combines the concept of “heart” with Xunzi’s “goodness-right principles, equal governance-rituals and righteousness”. “Three similar concepts are connected together to say that “nature” is evil, that is, “knowledge-ability” has no propriety meaning, that is, “heart” has no propriety meaning (the lack of etiquette in the heart cannot prove that the nature is evil, but can only prove that the heart is neither good nor evil. Park). In a nutshell, Chen Wen’s problem is that he takes “the mind is born without etiquette and justice” as the theoretical starting point for Xunzi’s argument about “evil nature”Malawians Sugardaddy, and equates “nature – heart”, equates “lack of propriety and righteousness – evil”, and interprets “nature – evil heart – evil nature” as equals No. Chen Wen’s interpretation is very absurd in terms of conceptual logic and propositional logic (it violates the laws of logic and makes conceptual leaps), and it is even more inconsistent with Xun Shu’s theory of establishment.
First, “Xing” in “Xunzi” obviously includes the content of lust and consciousness. The word “Xing” appears 118 times in “Xunzi”, and the meanings are roughly the same. They all refer to natural conditions or innate functions. If Xunzi’s concept of “knowledge of material nature” is not used and the concept of “knowledge of blood, Qi, heart” is used, then Xunzi’s “Xing” ” refers to both the ordinary blood and gas functions and the ordinary mental and cognitive functions (the word Xing comes from The side of life is the movement of the psychology, and the side of the heart is the movement of the mind). “Correct Name” says, “The reason why life is the way it is is called xing; what is born from the sum of xing, combined with the induction, is called xing naturally without doing anything. The likes and dislikes of xing Joy, anger, sorrow, and joy are called emotions.” He also said, “Xing is the result of nature, emotion is the quality of nature, and desire is the response of emotion.” Nature is reflected in the level of the mind, including likes and dislikes, but nature is not entirely in the mind, because the mind must be based on the flesh and blood, and the nature of the mind must be based on the flesh. The nature of flesh and blood is the nature of ordinary psychology. This is the basis or outline of the human nature and ability, and the nature of flesh and blood. Therefore, “Evil Nature” says, “The nature of ancient people was born to be interested in profit, and they were willing to compete for life and refuse to give in.” die; live However, there are diseases and evils, and obedience is the reason why cripples and thieves are born, and loyalty and trust are lost; people are born with desires and good looks, and obedience is the reason why promiscuity is born, and etiquette, justice, culture, and ethics are lost. , it must be out of contention…”. This is what Yan Fu said: “Whatever is natural is called sex, and what is innate is called sex… There is a saying that the nature of human beings is the heart, blood, desires, and emotions.” [3]
Secondly, the word “neng” in “Xunzi” obviously does not completely eliminate the senses and desires. The word “neng” is found 519 times in “Xunzi”, most of which have two meanings: able and abilityMalawians Escort and the first meaning is derived from the second meaning righteousness. “Correct Name” says: “The likes and dislikes of nature, joy, anger, sorrow, and joy are called emotions. Emotions are only chosen by the heart, which is called worries. People who worry about them can move them, which is called false. ) [②], how can we get used to it and then become what we call false… So what is capable of being in people is called capable, and what is called capable can be achieved(In the Tang Dynasty, Yang Liang said that the word “Neng” was “Nai”). “As far as the “Correction of Names” is concerned, Xunzi explains “neng” in terms of the ability to think about and understand the mind. However, the “neng” in Xunshu does not exclude abilities such as lust, because Xunzi said that “people can learn what they have learned.” ”, “can learn and be able” means that people have the ability to do it without learning, as mentioned before, “Born with the benefit of others, born with diseases and dislikes, born with the desire of others”, and another example. Xunzi said ” The ability of “eyes are clear and ears are sharp” is another example of “Ai Gong” chapter “You can’t hear without the ears, you can’t taste without the mouth”, which refers to the ability of the ears and mouth. Mencius “What a person can’t learn, he can do well.” “Neng” also means that people have the ability to do without learning. Therefore, “Neng” in Xun Shu mainly refers to the ability obtained or implemented through mental knowledge, and also includes the ability of ordinary physical and mental qualities, including psychology and psychology. The ability of desire. This is similar to the fact that “blood and heart knowledge” all belong to the nature of being able to do without learning, and the same is true for “knowledge and ability”. Not all “knowledge and ability” are “-false” and have no ” The content or reason of “nature – generation”.
Thirdly, “the nature of heart and nature does not have etiquette and righteousness” obviously does not mean that the heart and nature are evil. Xunzi’s “Evil Nature” The article refutes Mencius’s theory of good nature, pointing out that Mencius praised and promoted his belief in “knowing oneself and good abilities” and “inherent in me” that nature is good, but he did not understand “the difference between false nature” and “the difference between good and evil”, mixed concepts and made nonsense propositions. Xunzi said, “The so-called good ones in ancient times and today are those who are righteous and peaceful; the so-called evil ones are those who are dangerous and rebellious: this is the distinction between good and evil.” He also said, “If you don’t have a teacher, you will be dangerous. Improper; without propriety and justice, it is contrary to chaos and does not govern.” “Bu Gou” says that “propriety and justice are called governance, and those that are not propriety and justice are called chaos.” The state of upright governance or the state of etiquette and justice is called good, while the state of being in danger and chaos is called the state of non-propriety and justice. It is called evil, so good and evil are concepts of justice, such as social ethics, social order, and social life, and are the right and wrong evaluations of ethical values. According to the logic of syllogism, Having etiquette and righteousness is equal to being kind, or etiquette and righteousness is equal to goodness. If the heart/nature does not have etiquette and righteousness, it means that the heart/nature is inherently unkind. However, the fact that the heart/nature is inherently unkind does not mean that the heart/nature is inherently evil. It only means that the heart/nature is inherently unkind. Either bad or not good; then “no good/not good/not good” is not the same as “evil”, because “no good/not good/not good > evil”, because no good/not good/not good includes both “evil” of The situation also includes the “neutral” situation of neither good nor evil – good is a positive value and evil is a negative value. “Neutral” is 0 in the numerical coordinate, which is the zero coordinate of the origin, not +N and not -N. , Chen Lin has no logical knowledge in reasoning about the relationship between “born without etiquette – evil heart – evil nature”, and he absolutely does not understand the common and incomprehensible concept of “no good/not good/not good ≠ evil” No matter how popular the conceptual logic is, Chen Wen has made a conceptual change or a leap in logic that is very critical: “The heart/nature is not good = the heart/nature is evil” and he thinks he is superb.
p>
Chen Wen once said, “When talking about sex in the natural and simple sense, no matter the natural desires and reactions, or the generated ‘knowledge’ and ‘ability’, there is no good or evil value at all. “Very good! Isn’t this what Xunzi clearly said: “nature is originally simple”? However, when Xunzi discusses human nature, there are also theories about good nature and evil nature besides “natural simplicity”? Is it difficult?Dao Xunzi also fell into the ridicule of “those who do not realize the difference between human nature and fakeness” and did not understand that “nature is originally simple, but fakeness means that culture and science are prosperous”, “the so-called good nature is not separated from its simplicity and beauty, and is not separated from its simplicity” Is it “to benefit from capital”? Since Chen Wen also agrees that there are generated “knowledges” and they have no good or evil value, then why does he only focus on ungenerated powers and say that this kind of knowledge is “evil” (ungenerated powers are still natural) / category of nature)? Or is it possible to conclude that “nature is evil” based on the knowledge that evil phenomena will appear as a result of energy, but completely disregard Xunzi’s definition of “nature” in terms of the state of generation and the original state to rectify the name? ——So the whole concept of Chen Wen is confusing and his thinking is crude, so much so that he is completely unaware of the inconsistency and difficulty in looking at the beginning and end. In fact, Chen Wenshi explained “evil nature” by saying that there is no desire in human nature and the consequences of desire can be evil or often evil. This is nothing more than a concept of “heart-shielding” in the article, and said that nature is not evil, but the heart is inherently ungrateful and righteous. Because desire causes evil due to concealment, it is “evil in nature”. This proves that Xunzi’s “nature is evil”. Does Xunzi think nature/original conscience is evil or not? Is evil the root of life or the end of one’s mind and the result of one’s actions? Is Xunzi the “one” or the “two” mentioned by Mencius and Dai Zhen?
“Heart of Efficiency”, and then said that Xunzi believed that the human heart has no There is often a lack of etiquette and righteousness in people’s behavior, so the nature is evil: “The so-called ‘evil nature’ means that the mind as ‘nature’ does not have etiquette and righteousness because it is born, and it cannot be changed by knowing the way of etiquette and righteousness.” A state of ‘danger and chaos’ that leads to de facto indecency… …It is judged as evil on the basis that the natural ‘nature’ (perhaps ‘heart’) does not have propriety and righteousness. “But the ability of the heart to understand propriety and righteousness and grasp justice is not a matter of nature, just as it is not a matter of nature that the heart has propriety and righteousness. The problem is the same, so regardless of “heart” or “emotion” , the results of the operation of “nature” cannot be good or evil, and cannot prove that nature is good or evil, and Xunzi’s “nature” does not refer to advanced cognition and control functions other than nature. Don’t take the “false” content for granted. “Sex” content, sex is related but also different. Therefore, the lack of etiquette and righteousness in the human heart does not prove that the nature is evil. The fact that ordinary people indulge their feelings or do not control their passions or external temptations and lead to evil results does not mean that they have good intentions and evil nature. The original intention is good and the nature is not evil, nor is it “nature” evil”. Therefore, in the face of rigorous documentation and logic, any clever conceptual play or practice called hermeneutics or hermeneutics can easily be exposed.
Chen Dengyuan, a scholar of the Republic of China who has systematically studied “Xunzi”, once questioned Xunzi’s “theory of evil nature”. He made a review of the chapters, concepts, and propositions of “Xunzi” After some combing and refutation, we found that: people’s self-interested temperament and desires are in Xun It seems that Zi is not necessarily evil himself. Xunzi opposes the ascetic “endurance”, but treats lust very positively; It proves that “he also has a good heart for righteousness”, so “I strongly believe that Xunzi is not evil by nature”Theorists, but those who hold the theory that passions are evil” [4]. “…Bullying one’s own thoughts to prove Xunzi’s theory of evil nature in a scientific way is another name for the theory that passions are evil. Regardless of the other, these two points are enough to arouse our doubts about Xunzi’s theory of evil nature. “[5] Among today’s scholars, Shandong Lubin teaches that “evil nature” is not explained by the inherent evil of nature and the inherent evil of human feelings, but Xunzi is explained by the consequences of human nature or evil (perhaps evil, capable of evil)” MW EscortsThe true meaning of Xunzi’s theory of “evil nature” is: “Human natural desires have no regard for good or evil, Malawi Sugar DaddyBut unchecked natural lust will definitely lead to evil. “[6]
This kind of defensive view of Xunzi’s “evil nature” is based on the social consequences of human behavior that can appear “evil”. Among the former sages, Wang Guowei, Mou Zongsan is also an exemplary representative. Wang Guowei said in his 1905 article “Xunzi’s Theory”: “…From its abstract aspect, there is nothing inherently good in lifeMalawians Sugardaddy There is no doubt that there is goodness; but if we look at it from a specific aspect, the desire for career often destroys the harmony of society, so it is concluded that the nature is evil. “[7] Mou Zongsan’s 1968 first edition of the book “Mind Body and Nature Body” said: “… Therefore Gaozi said that ‘the nature of life’ means ‘food and color nature’, that is, ‘nature is the same’ “Qiliu” and “nature is like turbulent water” are said to take the meaning of neutral material, and this meaning of “neutral” does not conflict with the meaning of “evil nature”. Xunzi also said that “nature is originally simple and simple” (“Lun”), “original and simple” means neutral meaning, and following it without restraint means “evil nature”. “[8] “Xunzi” said: “The so-called good ones in ancient times and today are just principles and peaceful governance; the so-called evil ones are dangerous and chaotic: this is the distinction between good and evil. “According to this concept of “good-evil”, Wang Guowei and Mou Zongsan obviously used the behavior to be evil to prove that Tao is inherently evil and will be evil.
From Wang Guowei and Chen Dengyuan to Mou Zongsan, Ludbin, etc., of course the above defense It is absurd, self-contradictory or conceptually dissociated. If nature is indifferent to good or bad, then the theory of “evil nature” is false; if the theory of “evil nature” is true, then nature is indifferent to good or bad and must be false; behavior will appear The social evaluation of “evil” proves at its most basic that it is not It proves that all people are “evil” by nature, just as the emergence of “good” social evaluations cannot prove that all people are “good” by nature. It is said that “evil” behavior will appear in the state or result of ordinary people, but ordinary people will not. There will also be cases of “good” behavior State or result, and whether there are “evil” effects or “good” effects, it is not inevitable that it will be good or evil. Therefore, it is not inevitable that human nature will be evil (it is also not inevitable that human nature will be good), If it’s not inevitable, of course it’s not natural.. Nature is inevitable, and it is called “nature” when we are born with it, which is what “Xunzi Honor and Shame” and others have repeatedly stated: “It is what people are born with, and it is what happens without waiting. This is what Yu Jie said “The same thing” is “nature” or “nature”. Of course, this “nature” or “nature” does not necessarily have to be evil, nor does it have to be good!
II
I would also like to solemnly point out that Xunzi does not actually hold that ” “Evil nature” theory, Xunzi’s “Evil nature” is not to argue that “evil nature” To refute the theory that good nature coexists with evil nature, but to argue that nature has no good nature and that good nature coexists with simple nature theory and the hypocritical theory of habits, I studied this issue in Gao Buying of Hebei Province in 1890, Liu Nianqin of Sichuan Province in 1923, Japan (Japan) Kanetani Haru in 1950, and Japan ( Japan) Kodama Liulang in 1974 and Guangdong Zhou Chicheng in 2002 conducted detailed theoretical analysis and text correction based on questioning Xunzi’s theory of “evil nature”. For details, please see my long article “Uncovering Two Thousand Years of Academic Mysteries – Xunzi” on the confucius2000 website in 2008. “Proposal for the Revision of Zi’s “Evil Nature””, my 2010 essay “The Structure and Ideological Value of Xunzi’s Theory of Simplicity of Nature”, and my 400,000-word doctoral thesis “The Way of Heaven and Humanity and Human Faces – Pre-Qin Confucianism” that I defended in 2012 Chapter 3 of Kao Yuan on “Nature and the Way of Heaven”. It is a pity that after writing a paper in our school’s Xun Shu’s “Evil Nature” with the word “evil nature” as “bad nature”, it was submitted everywhere but was not published (I had no choice but to publish it online), but “Modern Philosophy” canceled it at the end of 2012. I compressed it. draft” “On the Thought System and Significance of Xunzi’s Theory of Nature”, which was later published in the “Journal of Handan University” in the form of a paper from the 2012 Handan Xunzi Symposium, with a detailed “Collation Sample of the Song Version of “Xunzi·Xunzi””.
Zi’s Social and Historical Philosophy”. He believed that the “Xinge” chapter was not written by Xunzi himself but was added by Xunzi’s followers and others and was a “fake book”. However, this view was actually seen in Liu Nianqin’s “Morning Post Supplement” serialized on January 16, 17, and 18, 1923. “Xunzi’s Views on Humanity”, with Liang Qichao’s words attached to the front of the text: “This admonishment is as good as faithMalawi Sugar, the academic community has turned to koan”, “I feel that this issue is seriously related, and it is urgent to introduce it to promote the governance of the country.” . However, those Chinese who doubt that the “theory of evil nature” is not attributed to Xunzi can be traced back to Gao Buying, a native of Hebei in the Qing Dynasty. Cai Yuanpei’s diary in 1896 stated that he had personally seen 20 manuscripts of “Xunzi Dayi Shu” written by Gao Buying, a native of Hebei Province, and claimed that Gao’s syndrome “the theory of evil nature was not written by Xunzi” and “the theory of evil nature was not written by Xunzi”. Xunzi’s words such as “natural nature” and “original materials are simple” just prove that “the accusation of evil nature is self-defeating”. He said that Gao “established the facts, collated and corrected them, and discovered things that have not been discovered by future generations, let alone the crotch index. Xun Xun”He is the hero of the family” [9]. Gao said that it was long before Liu said that it is a pity that Gao’s book has not been found so far, or the manuscript has no longer survived [③]!
The author does not agree with Xun Shu The “Sexual Evil” chapter is a forged or later opinion (“Morning Post Supplement” published Hu Rui’s “Research on “Xunzi’s Views on Humanity” on February 6, 1923″ to refute Liu Wen). At the same time, it is also believed that the ancient Nowadays, scholars use the evil desires or the consequences or evil of human nature to prove that nature is evil. Some say that Xunzi’s “evil nature” does not refer to the evil nature of human beings. Some say that simplicity of nature and evil nature are not incompatible [④], or Kodama Rokuro’s style. To unify simplicity, goodness, and evil, this actually turns a deaf ear to the definitions of categories such as “nature-false” and “good-evil” that Xunzi repeatedly emphasized in “Correcting Names”, “Xing Xing”, and “Confucian Effects” Malawi Sugar Daddy, whose exploration has inadvertently fallen into conflict with his own logic or with XunMalawi Sugar Daddy‘s book directly contradicts Xun’s clear definitions of “nature-false” and “good-evil” and the clear proposition that “nature is originally simple—human nature is clearly evil.” “Simple” and “evil nature” are the most basic concepts in “Xunzi” Any well-intentioned explanation or reconciliation is in fact in clear conflict with Xun Shu’s own definition and proposition and thus becomes invalid and redundant.
According to the author’s research in the past ten years. [⑤], Xun Shu is the only one who says “XingMalawians Escortevil” The word “evil nature” in the chapter “Evil Nature” was caused by the corruption of the word “bad nature” in the late Western Han Dynasty. The big mistake is the first time in the book “Xunzi”Malawians Sugardaddy was compiled by Liu Xiang at the end of the Western Han Dynasty, and he mistakenly revised Xun Shu’s theory of nature due to the rampant philosophical trends of “good-evil”, “nature-emotion”, and “yin-yang” in the Han Dynasty. The word “not good” in the chapter (pre-Qin customs were used to talk about good and bad things, Confucius, Mencius and Xun Shu agree with it. There are 15 parallels in Xun’s book, and there is still “not good” at the end of the chapter “Evil Nature”MW “Escorts” is not correct) [10]. According to Xun Shu’s theory of “evil nature – simple nature”, it touches on the conceptual definitions of “nature”, “falseness”, “good” and “evil” as well as the definition of “nature” “Evil” chapter refutes Mencius’ argument that nature is good and Zhang Xing is simple and hypocritical by using bad nature. Editing, argumentation tone, argumentation rhetoric, etc., the author firmly believes in the conclusion of this “not good” review, and I also hope that “Xunzi” said “nature is not good” rather than “evil nature”, which is what the scholars of the Qing Dynasty did. Undiscovered collation conclusions can be confirmed by more rare documentsIn addition, we are even waiting for underground pre-Qin and pre-Chinese texts directly related to Xun to be unearthed in the future to fully confirm it.
Sex is falsely combined, and then he becomes a saint, and contributes to the whole world. This is why it is said: The six unions bring about the birth of all things, the yin and yang join together to change, and the nature is combined to govern the whole world.” (“Li Lun”) also said: “Mencius said: The ancients’ good nature will all be lost. Therefore, it is said that if it is true, it is the nature of the ancients. If you are born apart from simplicity and talent, you will lose it and lose it… The so-called good nature is to be beautiful without being separated from simplicity, and to benefit from simplicity without being separated from the talent. If you can do it. You can see clearly without leaving your eyes, and you can hear clearly without leaving your ears. Therefore, it is said that the eyes are clear and the ears are sharp. “(“Evil Nature”) This is to discuss “nature” based on the “simplicity” of material, material, and nature of materials. Nature is the nature of materials. Without materials, there is no nature. The simplicity of materials is nature. Simplicity, simplicity of nature is the natural state, not the result of “forgery” [11]. “Xing is the result of heaven; emotion is the quality of nature; desire is the response of emotion. Ask for what you want if you can get it, but it is inevitable to have emotion… Therefore, even if you are guarding the door, your desires will not be fulfilled. “Going is the manifestation of sex.” This means that sex is mostly manifested as emotion, and emotion is mostly manifested as desire. Love is inevitable, and desire is inevitable. Materials and qualities may be “beautiful” (“Encouragement to Learning”) and “unbeautiful” (“Evil Nature”), or “virtuous but unworthy” (“You Sitting”), but feelings are “not beautiful” and humanity is “not good” (“Evil Nature”). “Evil”) , so Xunzi advocated “initiating etiquette and righteousness and formulating legal styles”, “transforming the teachings into etiquette and righteousness”, “correcting people’s emotions by modifying them, and guiding them by disturbing people’s emotions” (“Evil Nature”) 》).
“Shangshu” says “This is unrighteousness, habits and nature will become it”, Kong Anguo, a descendant of Confucius, noted that “unrighteousness in words and deeds will become his nature”, “Confucius Confucius” 》Kong Bin said, “If the work remains unchanged, and the habits and body are formed, it will be natural.” Confucius said that “nature is close, habits are far apart”, and “little success is like the original nature, habits are as consistent as nature” and so on (“Jia Zi”, “Hanshu” and other quotes from Confucius), these are all just like Xunzi’s clear understanding of “nature – false”, The difference between “nature and habit” never attributes the good or evil of habits and virtues to human nature or original intention. Therefore, “Xunzi” also says that when you get along with evil and non-evil people, “Those who advance in benevolence and righteousness without knowing it are the result of cowardice…Those who are punished and killed without knowing it are the result of cowardice” (“Evil Nature”) 》), said, “However, it is human nature to accumulate false etiquette and righteousness” (“Evil Nature”), and said, “The gains of those who follow the Dharma are accumulated Malawi Sugar Daddy, it’s not about nature” (“Ruxiao”), “Long and short natures are caused by accumulation and exhaustion” (“Ruxiao”), “Customs change one’s will, and stability changes quality” (“Ruxiao”) ), “Annotate the wrong customs, so change “Xingye” (“Confucianism”), “Knowing the long and short of ability and talent is the same, it is the fault of misinterpretation of customs” (“Honor and Shame”), “The accumulation of misinterpretation of customs” (“Honor and Shame”), “Sage Accumulated thoughts and false habits lead to the birth of etiquette and righteousness.”French style” (“Evil Nature”).
The mainstream view of humanity in late Confucianism is not actually the theory of good nature. ) Scholar Dazai Harutai said “Ke’s Tao is good in nature, but he only cares about what he teaches. Ke is eager to teach, and he does not realize that what he says goes against the Tao.”[12] Therefore, Kang Youwei said in “Wanmu Caotangkou Shuo”: “Everything that talks about nature is Gao Zi is right and Mencius (Zi) is not, and Confucius can be used to reconcile them. Gaozi’s theory is a theory passed down by Confucius, which generates human nature. There is no good or evil in nature, good and evil are governed by saints. “[13][⑥] Fu Sinian’s “Diagnosis of Ancient Teachings on Life” also said: “Although Xunzi’s theory is contrary to Mencius… it is actually the true biography of Confucius. Because Mencius did not take a new path, Xunzi returned to his roots… In terms of human theory, it was Xunqing, not Mencius, who followed Confucius’s approach to evolution. “[14] In “Mencius: Gaozi 1”, Mencius criticized Gaozi’s theory that “life is called human nature”, “human nature is neither good nor bad”, and “nature is neither good nor bad”, but this may not necessarily be the case with Mencius in history. I really refuted the accusation at that time Confucius (“Mencius” only records arguments that are beneficial to Mencius), and academically speaking, it is not necessarily true that Confucius is incorrect and Mencius is correct. The academic circles in the Qin and Han Dynasties were very clear about this, and many people in the Qin and Han Dynasties regarded Mencius’s “good nature” theory as wrong. , Dong Zhongshu, Yang Xiong, Wang Chong, Xun Yue, etc. all opposed the theory of “good nature”. ·Evil Nature” Before the text was corrected The influence on scholars is still observable today. Kang Youwei once said in “Wanmu Caotangkou Shuo”: “Xing is the quality of life, and there is no good or evil… What is called nature by heaven is said to be based on heaven… Dong Zi’s statement that life is called human nature is a solid footnote. In short, “nature is born, goodness is man-made”, the two sentences are the best. “[13] 332, 346, 378 Cai Yuanpei’s “Xun Qing Lun” said, “Han Ying’s “Wai Zhuan” contains no words that are not Mencius, and Dong Sheng’s “Cha Ming” does not cite the theory of evil nature” [15][⑦], Song Dynasty The original “Xunzi” Liu Xiang’s “Sun Qing Shu Lu” says, “When the Han Dynasty flourished, Jiangdu Dong Zhongshu is also a great Confucian, and his writings are beautiful. Sun Qing” [16]. In “Hanshu Biography of Dong Zhongshu”, Dong Zhongshu’s “Xianliang Countermeasures” said: “Simpleness is called nature, and nature cannot be cultivated; human desire is called emotion, and emotion is not There is no restraint in the system… The next step is to enlighten the people and cultivate their character. “” Age of Flowers Dew·In-depth Observation of Names” refutes Mencius’ theory of good nature and says: “The name of nature is not born?” It is called nature as it is born with natural resources. Nature is quality. Can the nature of nature be combined with the name of goodness? …The name of nature cannot be separated from matter. If it is separated from matter like hair, then it is not nature, and it cannot be achieved without inspection. ” Age Fan Lu·Shen Xing” also said: “According to the words of the sage, there is no such thing as “good nature”, but “I cannot see evil people.” If all the people are already good-natured, why should evil people not be seen? Looking at what Confucius meant when he said this, he thought it was very difficult to be good, but Mencius thought that all people can do it. That’s too much! …Xingtai gradually learns lessons and then can do good deeds. The nature of good teaching cannot be achieved by simplicity, so it is not called nature…nature is the simplicity of nature, and good people are the transformation of the king’s teaching. Without its quality, the king’s teaching cannot be transformed, and without its king Simple teachings cannot lead to goodness. This is exactly the ideological relic of Xunzi’s theory of “simple nature”, and it is also exactly what Xunzi said: “Xing is the original material, and falseness is the flourishing of arts and sciences. If there is no nature, then there is no falseness, and if there is no falseness, then nature cannot be beautiful.” “The translation. – ——Dong Zhongshu “Simplicity is called nature”, “Xing is the simplicity of nature”, “(goodness) cannot be achieved by simplicity, so it is not called nature”, “It is called nature as it is born with the natural qualifications” is inappropriate It’s from Xunzi’s Theory of Rites Is it true that “nature is originally simple” and “Xunzi: Evil Nature” states that “(nature) is born apart from its simplicity, separated from its capital, it will be lost and lost” (that is, losing the simplicity and capital to hope? Evil is not what Mencius calls losing one’s good nature as evil) ? Essentially, the words “simplicity – raw material”, “simple nature – raw material”, and “natural resources/natural – raw simplicity/raw capital” used by Dong and Xun are completely synonymous. There is no doubt that they all have “sexuality” ” is a humanistic view based on “material/quality” that is simple in material, unsophisticated and “simple in nature”!
Another example is that Jia Yi, who was re-transmitted by Xunxue, also used “simple” /Simple” is used to describe people’s It is simple, and praises Confucius and Xun’s theory of nature and the difference between teaching and practice. “Le Ji”, which comes from Xunzi’s later studies, does not talk about nature in terms of good and evil and has no ontology or transcendental theory of nature (Mencius’s theory of good nature is based on ontology of nature and transcendental theory of virtue). ), Xunzi’s disciple Liu Xiang, the fourth generation king of Chu Yuan Dynasty, said in “Shuo Yuan” that “the good and evil of human beings are not by nature, they are inspired by things and then act.” Xunzi’s later generations, Han Fei and Li Si, did not advocate the theory of “evil nature”[⑧] , nothing more than caring about humanity and profit Mr. Liu Zehua once pointed out: “Many scholars classify the Legalist view of human nature into the evil theory of human nature, which is really not in line with the original intention of Legalism. Legalism fundamentally does not judge human nature from the perspective of ‘evil’ or ‘good’Malawi Sugar. Just because Han Fei’s teacher Xunzi linked profit with evil in human nature, Han Fei should not be included in his teacher’s school, and then Han Fei would go on to implicate all Legalists in the school of evil in nature. This is unfounded. “[17]
Three
Some commentators say that Xunzi’s theory of evil nature ” The original intention is not to truly admit that human nature is inherently evil, but to believe that human nature is inherently evil. “Tao is originally the natural mind that needs to be transformed.” He believed that Xunzi’s theory of “evil nature” could be misunderstood because he confused “emotion”, “nature” and “desire”… In order to advocate Confucian rituals and music ‘, we have no choice but to use ‘evil nature’ as its theoretical basis. Its most basic goal is to ‘change nature into falsehood’ and ‘change evil into good’… His most basic understanding of ‘humanity’ is actually that ‘humanity is inherently neither good nor evil’” [18]. This theorist was influenced by Zhou Chicheng, Lin Guizhen began to pay attention to the influence of Xunzi’s works on practical simplicity. Xunzi’s theory of simple nature is of course good, but Xunzi’s concepts of “nature-emotion” are clear and clear. There is no such “misunderstanding” theory invented to reconcile “evil nature-simple nature”.
Yu Kailiang said: “Potential natural materialsIn the process of communicating with foreign objects, if human nature lacks human intervention and conforms to its nature (shunshi), the inevitable result will be the pursuit of interests, danger and chaos… There are two levels of development… Xunzi’s so-called evil in human nature is not inherent evil, it is just a developmentMalawians Sugardaddy is evil in the biological sense, but at the bottom is the basic nature of human nature that does not matter good or evil. ” [19] This is actually a variation of using “emotional evil” to explain “nature evil”, and this type of explanation has been discussed by others before, such as the aforementioned Wang Guowei, Chen Dengyuan, and Mou ZongsanMalawi Sugar, Ludbin, etc. Ludbin’s 2004 paper interpreted Xunzi’s theory of human nature as “human’s natural desires are neither good nor evil, but uncontrolled natural desires will definitely lead to evil” [6], 2013 The paper in 2010 was also titled “Existence” To reconcile Xun Shu’s theory of “simple nature – evil nature” [20], Yu Kailiang and Ludebin have the same views.
Luther Bin has written many treatises in recent years to study Xunzi’s theory of humanity[⑨]. At first, he vigorously affirmed that Mencius’s theory of humanism “is an unprecedented insight and true knowledge, worthy of a large book and a special book”, but denied that Xunzi’s theory of humanism was “limited to one corner” and “biased”, etc., and later reconciled “Mencius’ theory of humanism” Theory of good nature – Xunzi’s theory of evil nature “calls each one” There are differences in the concept of “Xing” (the difference between “metaphysical propositions and empirical propositions”), emphasizing that Mencius said “Xing” in “the reason why people are human” (ethics) and Xunzi “adhered to the principle of ‘conventional’ and consciously In the sense of “nature” and the two are mutually Later, he confirmed and praised Xunzi’s theory of humanism, and explained Xun’s “evil nature” proposition from the perspective of “emotion and evil”, and even recently borrowed it from “Book of Rites and Music”. Human beings are born quiet, which is the nature of nature; they are moved when they feel things. The sentence “Xing Desire” means “Looking at ‘Xing’ from ‘human beings are born quiet’, ‘Xing’ means ‘simple’, natural and fair, without good or evil; looking at ‘Xing’ from ‘being moved by feeling things’, It is natural to follow one’s nature and have unbridled greed, which is bound to come from fighting, and it is suitable to violate the rules and regulations and end up in violence. ‘, so ‘nature’ is ‘evil’”, and even said that “the issue of ‘simple nature’ will definitely become a core issue that cannot be ignored or bypassed in the future research on Xunxue… Xunzi’s new system of Confucianism is also exactly A concept based on the concept of ‘simple nature’ is developed and established. “A masterpiece of ‘Xing pseudo-combination’”.
Luther Binzheng used it to demonstrate the “unfeeling-already feeling” or “undeveloped-already feeling” of “Xing” “Le Ji”, which means “fa”, “the future of life has changed the fate of the mother. Is it time to regret it? “Quietness is the nature of nature; being moved by things is the desire of nature.” The “desire of nature” is written as “the praise of nature” in “Historical Records·Yue Shu”, Yu Yue’s “Qun Jing Ping Yi” It is said that “the word “ode” refers to appearance. “Rong” refers to appearance, which is extended to the meaning of expression. Therefore, the musicologist Lu Ji’s “Yue Ji”I compiled this work “Ode to Nature” [⑩] and translated the word “Ode” as “expression”. Cai Zhongde’s “Legends of Music” “Annotations and Research on Soundless Sad Music” translated it as “exhibition”. The “Leji Translation and Annotation” of the joint resistance translated it as “the expression of nature…”, which is consistent with The following part of the sentence, “Things are known until they are known, and then likes and dislikes are in shape; likes and dislikes are not internal, and knowledge and temptation are external.” The semantics are coherent and consistent. Therefore, Xunzi uses “moving after feeling things, the desire of nature” to demonstrate The “undeveloped” nature is original and the “already developed” nature is ineffective.
Xunzi: Correcting Names quoted by Lu Bin “The reason why life is the way it is is called nature; what is born from the sum of natures is a combination of precision and induction, and it is natural without incident. SayMW The sentence “Escorts‘s nature” should not be divided according to the Lu theory into “the reason why it is born” which refers to “quietness” and “it is natural without doing anything” which refers to “moving when feeling things”. Here, Wang Xianqian said: “‘Sheng of the sum of nature’ is regarded as ‘Sheng of the sum of’. This word ‘sheng’ is the same as the word ‘sheng of’ above, and it also means human life. The two ‘xings’ are related to each other.” Li, it is called the reason why nature is born. This is called nature, which is natural and inactive. The meaning of the name is very clear. Scholar Wu Baifei’s “Explanation of Xunzi’s Correct Names” said: “The reason why life is what it is is called ‘nature’. What is born from the harmony of nature, combines and reacts with each other, and is natural without doing anything, is called ‘nature’. Xing has two meanings. , use the same name but refer to different facts. The former refers to the natural nature of psychology, and the so-called “sheng” means Malawians Escort‘s nature. The latter is the place where induction occurs, which is what Mencius calls ‘end’.” [21] “The reason why life is so” is just the word “Xing” to explain the “why” of “life”. , it means that reason is based on “nature”; “the sum of things that arises” means that it responds to the natural and concrete nature, so later it is said that “the likes and dislikes of nature are called emotions”, etc. This is obviously not the opposite of “jing- “Moving” nature. Therefore, these two characteristics of Lu Bin are worthy of consideration. He has been suspected of being a “passionate person” or “wearing colored glasses”.
Another Hebei scholar came to “analyze” Xun-Korean humanism in a seemingly innovative way, and accused others of “misunderstanding” as if he had a new invention or discovery, saying: “Xunzi is a typical representative of the theory of “evil nature”, and due to the relationship between Han Feizi and Xunzi, academic circles widely believe that Han Feizi is the successor of Xunzi’s theory of humanism, even more advanced than Xunzi’s views on evil nature. Extreme. In fact, this is a misunderstanding… Both Xunzi and Han’s interpretations of humanism focused on finding the weakest humanistic support for their ideas of governing the country. system, while Han Feizi found a way to govern the country based on the private theory of human nature. “[22] But the theory is essentially: If the human nature is evil, who will make the laws and regulations of etiquette? Why should we abide by etiquette and respect etiquette and law?
Xunzi may not be a theorist of “evil nature”. Scholars have already argued that Han Feizi is not a theorist of “evil nature”Malawi Sugar Daddydistinguishes or clarifies [11], and continues to talk about the “evil nature” theory held by Xunzi and Han Fei’s masters and disciples. They are all repeating the same old tune of looking at the sky from a well, lacking in-depth exploration and clarity of original documents and academic frontiers. It is regrettable. As for the so-called “rule by etiquette” and “rule by law” when discussing Xun Han, this is inevitable in Xun Han’s theory of humanism, but it is not Xun Han’s thought. The key difference is that Xunzi advocates the justice of etiquette, while Hanzi’s theory of the rule of law is only the law of the king and herdsmen, and does not necessarily talk about the “righteousness of the law”.
The “Li” in Confucianism inherently has natural justice, because it comes from public life and public etiquette, and is different from a pure king or country. Confucius said that rituals are more “shameful and dignified” than punishments (“The Analects of Confucius: Weizheng”) as a written law for family establishment. This is actually due to the natural publicity and natural justice of rituals. Therefore, “Guanzi·Shu Yan” says “Law comes from etiquette, and etiquette comes from governance.” “Book of Rites: Zhongni Yanju” records that Confucius said, “What is etiquette? It is the governance of things. A gentleman must have his own governance when he has his own affairs.” “Book of Rites: Li Yun” “Also remember Confucius said “Ritual is the reality of righteousness. It coordinates all righteousnesses, so even though the rites did not exist before the king, they can be righteous.” [23] (Read at the end of this article. At the “International Academic Symposium on Xunzi’s Thoughts on Modern Values” in Lanling, Shandong in October 2013)
[References]
p>
[1] Chen Lin. Xunzi’s Theory of “Evil Nature” [J]. Morality and Civilization, 2010, (5): 80-87.
[2] Chen Lin. On the dual meanings of Xunzi’s “heart” [D]. Master’s thesis of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2006.
[3] He Xu Li. Tianyan Lun [M]. Translated by Yan Fu, Beijing: The Commercial Press, 1981: 84.
[4] Xunzi’s Philosophy [M] ．Shanghai: Commercial Press, 1928: 163.
[5] Chen Dengyuan. Xunzi’s Theory of Mind [J]. 4, 2 (2): 83.
[6] Ludbin. Xunzi’s Theory of “Evil Nature” [J]. Dongyue Lun Cong, 2004, (1).
[7] Lost Collection of Wang Guowei’s Philosophical Aesthetics Papers [M]. Shanghai: East China Normal University Press, 1993: 93.
[8] Mou Zongsan. Mind and Nature [M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House, 1999: 77. p>
[9] Cai Yuanpei. Cai Yuanpei’s Diary[M]. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2010: 45-46.
[10] Lin Guizhen: Uncovering a two-thousand-year-old academic mystery – Proposal for the revision of “Xunzi” on “evil nature” [J]. Open your eyes and see where your daughter-in-law is, Mom. ” Society of Science, 2015, (8).
[11] Lin Guizhen: The theoretical structure and ideological value of Xunzi’s Theory of Simplicity of Nature. Journal of Handan University, 2012, (4).
[12]Japan (Japan) Ideology Department: Volume 34[M]. Araki Migo, Inoue Tadashi, Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 1970: 405.
[13] Selected Works of Kang Youwei: Episode 2 [M]. Edited by Jiang Yihua and others, Shanghai: Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House, 1990: 382. p>
[14] Selected Works of Fu Sinian: Volume 2 [M]. Edited by Ouyang Zhesheng, Changsha: Hunan Education Publishing House, 2003: 618, 640.
[15] Selected Works of Cai Yuanpei: Volume 1[M]. Edited by Gao Pingshu, Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company. , 1984: 51.
[16] Collection of Wuqiubizhai and Xunzi: Volume 6[Z]. Edited by Yan Lingfeng, Taipei: Chengwen Publishing House, 1977: 877.
[17]Liu Zehua. Scholars and Society in Pre-Qin Dynasty[M]Malawians Escort. Tianjin: Tianjin National Publishing House, 2004: 147.
[18] Wang Hui, Yang Theory. There is no good or evil in human nature—— New Interpretation of “The Theory of Evil Nature” in “Xunzi” [J]. Journal of Changzhou University, 2013, (1).
[19] Yu Kailiang. “Simple nature” and “evil nature”: Xunzi’s dual dimensions of human nature [N]. Chinese Journal of Social Sciences, 2013-09-16.
[20]Lu Bin. Simple nature and evil nature: Xunzi’s words The Dimension and Theory of Nature[C]. “Xunzi’s Thoughts on Contemporary Values” Academic Symposium, Cangshan, Linyi, Shandong, 2013-10-12.
[21]Wu Fei 100. Seven Books on Pre-Qin Famous Studies [M]. Taipei: Hong’s Publishing House, 1984: 718- 719.
[22] Zhou Na, Wang Weiguo. Analysis of Xunzi and Han Feizi’s Theory of Humanity [N]. Guangming Daily, 2013-09-30. p>
[23] Lin Guizhen. On the social management thoughts of predecessors——Malawi SugarPre-Qin Confucianism is the center [J]. Confucius Research, 2015, (3).
【Note】
[①] Some commentators have long “analyzed Xunzi’s definition of human nature, his argument about evil nature, and the dual structure of Xunzi’s theory of human nature”, and concluded that “the heart knows Concept is the core concept of Xunzi’s theory of human nature and evil.” See the abstract of Chen Rong’s article “”Knowledge of the Heart” and “Evil Nature” – Research on Xunzi’s Humanistic Thoughts” (Master’s thesis of Fudan University, 2006).
The article “A Try to Say the Paraphrases of Heart” Discussed the word “” in the unearthed documents from “heart”, and believed that the “pseudo” in “Xunzi” “the heart can move after thinking about it” should be regarded as the original “”. Pang said it is quite true, and it can be followed, and See Volume 2 of “Collected Works of Pang Pu”, Malawi Sugar Daddy Shandong University Press 2005 edition, pages 203-213. ——Baoshan Chu Slips, Guodian Chu Slips, Shangbo Chu Slips, etc. all have the word “” from “心”. Ming Mei Yingzuo’s “Zihui” has the word “”. For details, see Teng Rensheng’s “Chu Style Slips and Silks” Text Edition” (updated edition), Hubei Education Press, 2008 edition, page 932.
1 940) Zhang Zongxiang (1882-1965), a native of Zhejiang who was mistaken for the character Langsheng, can be found in the article “Cai Yuanpei in the Hanlin Academy” by Gao Pingshu, published in the 43rd volume of “Selected Materials of Zhejiang Literature and History”, published by Zhejiang People’s Publishing House in 1990.
[④] Since Zhou Chicheng and Lin Guizhen discovered the “Xunzi” theory of “Xunzi”, they have attached great importance to Xunzi’s “Xunzi” theory and their authorship of Xunzi’s “evil nature” The two theories of “Xingpu” are not contradictory and have published many papers that provide related so-called coherent explanations. This will be reviewed in a separate article.
[⑤] His published related treatises on this issue include: “The Way of Heaven and the Way of Heaven and the Way of Humanity—A Textual Research on the Theory of “Nature and Way of Heaven” by Pre-Qin Confucians”, Chinese social science publications Society’s 2015 edition; “Unraveling Two Thousand Years of Academic Mysteries—Revision of “Xunzi’s “Evil Nature””, “Social Science” Issue 8, 2015; “Mencius’ Chapter Correction of “The Nature of the World” “, “Confucius Research “Issue 4, 2014; “Xunzi refutes good nature and says that nature is not good”, “China Social Sciences Journal”, September 30, 2013; “On the ideological system and significance of Xunzi’s theory of simplicity of nature”, “Modern Philosophy” 2012 Issue 6; “Theoretical Structure and Ideological Value of Xunzi’s Theory of Simplicity of Nature”, “Journal of Handan University”, Issue 4, 2012; “On the “Sex Theory” of Jiangsu People and Foreigners”, “Journal of Jiangsu Education University”, Issue 4, 2009 4 issues.
[⑥] The Bingshen version of “Wanmu Caotangkou Shuo” written by Lou Yuliebang: “When it comes to nature, Gaozi is right and Mencius is wrong. Confucius can reconcile them. Gaozi is the theory of Confucius. Born as a human being. There is no good or evil in nature. Those who are good and evil are established by sages.” – “Selected Academic Works of Kang Youwei” ：Changxing Xue Ji, Gui Xue Q&A, Wanmu Thatched Cottage,” Zhonghua Book Company, 1988 edition, page 195.
[⑦] The relevant complete sentence in Cai Yuanpei’s 1894 manuscript “Xun Qing Lun” is: “Xunzi regards repairing nature as the basis, taking long rituals as quality, and accumulating small things as strength. , taking the solution of shortcomings as enlightenment, changing the temperament, and overcoming selfish desires. Since the Song Dynasty, the Confucian ancestors have refined their words, and multiple births are… business, Gentlemen must distinguish, and they have already included the famous methods, Tao Zhu, soldiers and peasants. Fei Yuexue Mo Yingsong, Fei Shizi, explained the six shortcomings, and the seven strategies of the secular world, what Xunzi said was true. Zhang Huang Jing Jiao is like that , This is how Taoism is developed. This is the master of the six arts, and the commentator may cite a few words as a great innovation. Who knows that Han Ying’s “Wai Zhuan” does not contain any words that are not Meng’s, and Dong Sheng’s. “Chaming” Uncited The theory of evil has been circulated in other editions, and Han Fei and Li Sigu have written it, but it has not been generalized. If it is his father’s murder and his son’s actions, Su Ziwen’s speech can also be said. without “Distinguish it” (“Selected Works of Cai Yuanpei”, Volume 1, pp. 50-51, the citation time and punctuation are slightly changed)
[⑧] It is said that Han Fei holds “evil nature” like Xunzi. On “The view is quite popular in serious academic circles, for example: Feng Youlan’s “A Brief History of Chinese Philosophy”, Peking University Press, 1996 edition, page 140; Feng Youlan’s “History of Chinese Philosophy” Volume 1, East China Normal University Press, 2000 2019 edition, page 243; Hu Shi, “Outline of the History of Chinese Philosophy”, Commercial Press 1919 edition, page 321; Feng Youlan, “ChinaMalawians SugardaddyHistory of Philosophy”, The Commercial Press 1947 edition, page 398; Sun Shuping’s “Manuscript of the History of Chinese Philosophy” Volume 1, Shanghai People’s Publishing House 1980 edition, page 205; Yan Lingfeng’s “The Collection of Wuqiu Beizhai and Han Feizi” Volume 1, Chengwen Publishing House, 1980, pages 4, 11; Zhou Shifu, “History of Chinese Philosophy”, Sanmin Publishing House, 1983 Edition, page 164; Lao Siguang’s “New History of Chinese Philosophy” Volume 1, Sanmin Bookstore 1984 Edition, page 359; Xiong Shili’s “Comments on Han Feizi”, Student Bookstore 1984 Edition 16 pages; Cai Renhou’s “Outline of the History of Chinese Philosophy”, Student Bookstore 1988 edition, page 70; Wei Zhengtong “Xunzi and Modern Philosophy”, The Commercial Press 1992 edition, page 240.
[⑨] For example: “Xunzi’s Theory of Humanity: Simplicity of Nature, Evil Nature and Hypocrisy of the Heart—On the Logical Structure and Theory of Xunzi’s Theory of Humanity”, “Journal of Handan University” 》Issue 1, 2015; “Simple nature and evil nature: Xunzi talks about the dimensions and rationale of “nature” – the dispute between “natural nature” and “evil nature””Reflections on Xunzi’s Theory”, “Confucius Research” Issue 1, 2014; “Misreading in One Word and the Thousand-Year Destiny of Xunxue – On the Misreading of Xunzi’s “Evil Nature” Theory by Song Confucians”, “Hebei Academic Journal” 》20 Issue 5, 2012; “Good nature and evil nature: concealment and loss of thousands of years of litigation – a re-interpretation of Mencius and Xun’s distinction between good and evil in human nature”, “Journal of Chinese Studies”, Issue 3, 2012; “Xunzi’s “Nature” “evil” “On the Original Meaning”, “Dongyue Lun Cong”, Issue 1, 2004; “The Metaphysical Implications of Xunzi’s Theory of Humanity – My View on the Relationship between Xunzi’s and Mencius’ Theory of Humanity”, “History of Chinese Philosophy”, Issue 4, 2003; ” “On the Position and Significance of Xunzi’s Philosophy in the Development of Confucianism”, “History of Chinese Philosophy”, Issue 3, 1997; “Re-evaluation of Mencius’ Theory of Humanity”, “Qilu Academic Journal”, Issue 3, 1990; MW Escorts “Xunzi and Confucian Philosophy”, Qilu Publishing House, 2010; “Xunzi and Confucian Jingtong”, Shandong University doctoral thesis, 2003.
[⑩] For details, see: Ji Liankang: “Translation and Annotation of Yue Ji”, Music Publishing House, 1958, page 8; Cai Zhongde: “”Music Records”” Soundless “Music Theory” Annotation and Research”, China Academy of Art Publishing House, 1997, page 14; Lu Ji: “New Theory of “Music Theory””, Xinhua Publishing House, 1993, page 91. This sentence in “Yue Ji” is found in “Wenzi·Daoyuan” and “Huainanzi·Yuan Daoxun”: “Human beings are born quiet, which is the nature of nature; moving when sensing things is the harm of nature… You cannot turn against yourself, And the law of heaven is destroyed”, as “the harm of sex” and “WenziMalawi Sugar Daddy” and “Huainanzi” are consistent with the Taoist thought of all-nature. It is not a mistake to pretend that “nature is harmful”. The book “On the Meaning of Mencius” written by Ito Jinsai (1627-1705) of the ancient school of japan (Japan) states that this sentence in “Yue Ji” was derived from Taoist works. This statement and “Yue Ji” were compiled in the Western Han Dynasty by collecting the books of various scholars. The historical situation of the book is consistent.
[11] In addition to the aforementioned Mr. Liu Zehua, typical papers saying that Han Fei or Legalists hold the theory of evil nature include: Zhao Ruhe: “Han Fei is notMalawi SugarTheorists on Evil Nature”, “Journal of Social Sciences of Hunan Normal University”, Issue 4, 1993; Wang Liren: “Han Fei’s Humanistic Thoughts and Governance Strategies—Also Talking about Han Fei’s Not Being theorist on Evil Nature”, ” Journal of Jilin Normal University, Issue 1, 1994.
[Related articles]
Uncovering a two-thousand-year-old academic mystery – “Xunzi” “Evil Nature” Revision proposal
http://www.rujiazg.com/article/id/6071
http://www.confucius2000.com/admin/list.asp?id=3855
Review and Prospect of Xunzi’s Life, Cemetery Research and Xunzi’s Research
http://www.confucius2000.com/admin/list.asp?id=5923
New issues on Xunzi’s birth and death years Proof – Take the two records in “Salt and Iron Theory” as the middle one
http://w ww.rujiazg.com/article/id/4208
Xunzi refutes the good-natured nature, the bad nature of speaking, and the primitive nature of materials
http://www.rujiazg.com/article/id/3741
On the ideological system and significance of Xunzi’s Theory of Simplicity of Nature
http://www.rujiazg.com/article/id/3133
An examination of the composition and theory of Confucianism’s Gong—also discussing the true nature of the Confucian Gong-Xun school’s theory of heaven and earth
http://www.rujiazg.com/article/id/2513
Zigong Feikong’s later life Zhonggongkao
http://www.confucius2000.com/admin/list.asp?i d=4514
“Mencius” “The Nature of Words in the World” Chapter Bizheng
http://www.rujiazg .com/article/id/4278
Xun Qing praised the twelve chapters – and Professor Yang Haiwen of Sun Yat-sen University
http://www.rujiazg.com/article/id/2582
Visit the tomb of Xunzi in Lulan Mausoleum and burn it “Revision of “Evil Nature”” to sacrifice
http://linguizhen.blog. sohu.com/115486667.html
List of research papers on Xunzi’s theory of evil nature/humanity in the past 60 years
http: //www.rujiazg.com/article/id/3132
Proceedings of all Xunzi seminars in mainland China and other rare Xunzi documents
http://linguizhen.blog.sohu.com/280232183.html
Preliminary compilation of Xunzi’s research bibliography ( Timely replacement of new information editions and book collections)
http://linguizhen.blog.sohu.com/241249483.html
Editor in charge: Ge Can
發佈留言